Home | Contact ARP | Site Map | Search | Downloads
 

About Alexandra

 
FOCUS ON DELIVERY « previous page  
Sections in this site:
About Alexandra
Overview of the ARP
Projects & Progress
Community Interaction
Housing Developments
Urban Services
Economic Development
Social Infrastructure
Website Services
ARP photo sites: 
 ARP Photo Gallery
 Virtual Tour of Alex
Principals' sites: 
 Gauteng Housing
   City of Jo'burg
Alex-related sites: 
 Alexsan Kopano
 Alex Businesses

 

Social Dynamics in Alexandra in 2006

This article was written in 2006, and has been kept for those viewers who may be interested in the changing social dynamics in Alexandra township. For the latest commentary, please click here.

Written: February 2006

The present social dynamics in Alexandra are deeply rooted in the past. At face value, in 2006, Alexandra is enjoying a sustained period of relative peace with serious crime falling by 40%. This, however, conceals a tense social undercurrent that needs to be well understood to avoid provoking new conflict within the area.


Social divisions

A strong sense of social stratification exists. The key distinction is no longer between ideological enemies but rather between "old" and "new" residents of Alexandra.

The "old" residents can be defined as those who owned the original freehold properties and the backyard shacks that over time occupied the yards.

The "new" residents are either those that have settled the riverbanks, tributaries, schoolyards and road reserves, or those that have occupied the neighbouring factories. Settlements that  essentially occupy inappropriate state land are perceived to be a consequence of the political strategies of the 1980’s. The fact that some of them are now over 20 years has helped blur the "old" and "new" definitions.


       


Illegal occupation or exploitation?

Greater suspicion exists against those people who have occupied the buildings and factories around the periphery of Alexandra. It is widely believed that in the mid 1990s unscrupulous operators (including in some cases the factory and commercial property owners themselves) facilitated the occupation of the factories enabling greater revenues to be achieved by charging rents for the smallest sub division.

As confidence in Alexandra and interest in reopening businesses around Alex increases, greater revenue can be gained by redeveloping these facilities. Some landowners now wish to regain their buildings by simply evicting the residents to make way for development. The Alexandra community is highly suspicious of this process. A strong belief exists that these households will jump the housing queue because they are being evicted. They argue the factories were illegally occupied and to re-house such households in preference simply rewards illegal invasion without placing any responsibility on the slumlords that have profited over the years.

This dilemma poses a major challenge to the Alexandra Renewal Project.


       


  back to previous page   click to print this page  

  back to home page   back to top